30 March 2011
Low-level radiation from nuclear plant found in several states
24 September 2008
IS WI-FI PUTTING OUR
CHILDREN IN DANGER?
Adults may be safe, but what are the effects on youngsters exposed to radiation?
Tuesday September 16,2008
WITH wireless internet and mobile phones now in constant use in our schools and homes, TESSA THOMAS asks if youngsters are being exposed to hazardously high levels of radiation.
When Leah Homan is anywhere near a phone mast, her body alerts her – even before the mast comes into view.
“I get a sort of tingling and dizziness and sometimes a headache and then I know there’s one not far away.”
Leah, 12, is sensitive to the radiation from masts and other mobile telecommunications equipment. When she was two, a tumour was found around one of her kidneys. Fortunately it was discovered in time and removed.
Her mother Jackie feared that a phone mast close to their home in Sefton, Liverpool, may have been to blame, although this cannot be proven.
Even though Leah made a full recovery, as a toddler she was restless and later had difficulty sleeping and concentrating at primary school, where she needed extra help to compensate for her attention problems.
She still suffers intermittent insomnia, brain fog, headaches and the familiar tingling, which is worse when she’s near a computer and the wireless router is on.
In a world where most people are now close to a mobile mast or wi-fi network and live normal lives, such a reaction seems surprising. But more children are becoming sensitive to electromagnetic emissions from telecoms equipment.
And the number is set to increase inexorably, says pathologist Dr George Carlo of the Science and Public Policy Institute in Washington, who spoke at a recent Radiation Research Trust conference
Information carrying radio waves are everywhere – from wireless computers, cordless phones, mobile phones and masts. At least half of all primary schools and three-quarters of secondary schools in the UK now have wi-fi.
According to Dr Carlo, mobile telecommunications were launched without enough research to assess the risks to health and with little awareness of the extent to which children would be using the technology.
There are guidelines for safe exposure to emissions, implemented in the UK through the Health Protection Agency (HPA), but there are several problems. First, they take into account only the risk of damage caused by the body being heated up by the emissions. By contrast, the effects may be deep inside the tissue and cannot be felt.
Second, their upper “safe” limit is considerably higher than that in several other countries – 10 times as high as in Russia.
Also, the limits were based on the effect on a healthy adult of a half-hour exposure. Children not only spend much longer than anyone anticipated in front of laptops or with a mobile glued to their ear but have a different biological make-up that makes them more vulnerable.
“They have thinner skulls so the radio waves can penetrate more readily,” explains Dr Carlo. “A greater percentage of their bodies are water and they have a higher proportion of ions in their interstitial fluids, both of which increase absorption of radio waves. Also, their cells are dividing, making them more vulnerable to genetic damage.”
Symptoms include fatigue, sleep problems, tingling, neck pain, dizziness, headaches and nausea. Sceptics say there is no proof and these complaints could have many causes.
One study, reported in the British Medical Journal in 2006, concluded that electromagnetic sensitivity could be psychological. James Rubin and his team at the Institute of Psychiatry found that when people who said they were sensitive to radio waves were tested with real or sham waves, they were as likely to say that the dummy waves caused a headache.
“It doesn’t mean that their headaches were any less real but it did mean that they weren’t directly connected with the assumed cause,” says Rubin.
However, it is worth noting that the study was partly funded by mobile phone companies. A lot of the other symptoms of electromagnetic sensitivity – digestive problems, depression, memory loss – have a compound effect. This means that the longer the exposure goes on, the worse the problems are likely to get. “No one has any idea what chronic long-term exposure will do to children,” says Dr Carlo.
Some schools have decided against taking any risk and removed their wireless networks. The head of Ballinderry Primary School in Lisburn, Northern Ireland, Ian Thomson, announced recently that “the advantages of wi-fi seemed to be outweighed by the risks”, so he discontinued it.
What is worrying, says Dr Michael Kundi, head of environmental health at Vienna University, is that while children are more vulnerable than adults, there is no official threshold for emissions indoors – which is where youngsters are most often in the line of fire.
“Wi-fi may be limited in its power but that doesn’t mean it is safe for children. We have no evidence of that yet,” he says, adding that there are ways to configure networks in the classroom to limit emissions but few teachers know about them.
Although other countries – including Israel and Italy – are adopting lower exposure limits, the HPA says there is still insufficient evidence to issue separate guidelines for children.
07 December 2007
Speedlinking: lowlevel radiation update
Railcars With Radiation Markings Worry Galt Family
News10.net - Sacramento,CA,USA
... turned out to have been concrete and rebar from Sacramento Municipal Utility's former Rancho Seco Nuclear Plant, and contained low-level radiation. ...
See all stories on this topic
Firm Wants to Process Waste in Tenn.
Houston Chronicle - United States
A Utah nuclear waste company has proposed bringing 20000 tons of low-level radioactive garbage from Italy to Tennessee for processing, burning and recycling ...
See all stories on this topic
Nuke junk welcome in Utah, guv says
Salt Lake Tribune - United States
At the meeting, energysolutions will describe plans for the Italian waste and presumably explain the company's view that burying low-level waste is no ...
See all stories on this topic
Uranium Concentrations in Port Hope, Ontario
Government of Canada Newsroom (press release) - Ottawa,ON,Canada
The Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited is managing this initiative. Health Canada officials will assess the ...
See all stories on this topic
Blood Flow in Cervical Tumors Can Predict Outcome
HealthNewsDigest.com - New York,NY,USA
The level of red blood cells has long been thought to influence the response of tumors to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. ...
See all stories on this topic
Do cancers soar with CT scans?
Hindu - Chennai,India
The effect of low level radiation on living beings continues to be controversial (The Hindu, July 14, 2005). ACR declared that certain conclusions and ...
See all stories on this topic
Google Blogs Alert for: low level radiation
THE CHICKEN BUSINESS John the farmer was in the fertilized egg ...
By JR(JR)
The shortwave radiation entering the climate system depends on the Sun's irradiance and the Earth's reflectance. Often, studies replace the net sunlight by proxy measures of solar irradiance, which is an oversimplification used in ...
GREENIE WATCH - http://antigreen.blogspot.com/
The WiFi Blues
By pel(pel)
Saturating an entire city with WiFi adds to the existing burden of nonionizing radiation. That burden, called electrosmog by some, consists of long-term exposure to low-level concentrations of nonionizing radiation from familiar sources ...
nqcustf - http://xpbxtby.blogspot.com/
Wireless :: RE: is wireless harmful?
By Richard Cardona
Stewart claimed in the programme to have found evidence that low-level radiation from devices such as mobile phones and Wi-Fi could damage health, and called for a review. The claims prompted a council body in north London to call for ...
CapMac Forums - http://www.capmac.org/phpbb2/
Cell Phones Can Damage Your Eyes
By laure(laure)
Mercola's Comment: Electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from cell phones is a topic that provokes a good deal of controversy. Many experts believe that the radiation is too low-level to cause harm. However, they often base this on an ...
laure - http://lauremontelli.blog.com/
The WiFi Blues
By jyzpzc(jyzpzc)
Saturating an entire city with WiFi adds to the existing burden of nonionizing radiation. That burden, called electrosmog by some, consists of long-term exposure to low-level concentrations of nonionizing radiation from familiar sources ...
ggizjbycitw - http://rfrkywpmwfw.blogspot
Friends of the Earth
By Be Friends(Be Friends)
Low Level Radiation Campaign N-Base - information service on the nuclear industry No new nukes! - opposing construction of new nuclear power stations in the UK Nuclear Control Institute - US centre for preventing nuclear proliferation ...
Help Your Environment - How ? - http://bethefriend.blogspot
Do cancers soar with CT scans?
By Dr.K S Parthasarathy(Dr.K S Parthasarathy)
Low level radiation The American College of Radiology (ACR), the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) reacted to the NEJM paper with predictable alacrity. ...
My articles - http://ksparth.blogspot.com/
Cellphones can cause eye damage: Dr. Mercola
By Lady Broadoak(Lady Broadoak)
Electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from cell phones is a topic that provokes a good deal of controversy. Many experts believe that the radiation is too low-level to cause harm. However, they often base this on an examination of ...
LadyBroadoak Visionary Planetary... - http://ladybroadoak.blogspot
50 Things Youre Not Supposed To Know
By xco(xco)
34 Most Doctors Don't Know the Radiation Level of CAT Scans. 35 Medication Errors Kill Thousands Each Year. 36 Prescription Drugs Kill Over 100000 Annually. 37 Work Kills More People Than War. 38 The Suicide Rate IsHighest Among the ...
Blame It On The Voices - http://blameitonthevoices
10 Steps to be Safe from Cell Phone Radiation
By TechDune
Buy a phone with a low SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) : he SAR level is the way to measure the radio frequency of mobile phone. If SAR level is low, it will generate less radiation. So, whenever you purchase your mobile phone see the ...
TechDune - http://www.techdune.com
Google Web Alert for: low level radiation
Risks of low-level radiation higher than thought - 04 December ...Radon gas seeping into homes might cause more genetic damage and cancer than anyone realised, says a US team.
05 December 2007
Cell Phones Can Damage Your Eyes
A recent scientific study identified a link between microwave radiation of the kind emitted by cellular phones and two different kinds of damage to the eye. At least one type of damage apparently never heals.
When the eyeis exposed for a prolonged time to microwave radiation, thereis large-scale damage to the optical quality of the lens. But there seemed to be a maximum level to this kind of damage, and when the exposure stops, the damage begins to heal.
However, at the same time, a different kind of damage occurs at the microscopic level. Tiny "bubbles" appear on the surface of the lens. This kind of damage reaches no maximum level, but instead accumulates progressively, and it did not heal even after the experiment stopped. It was theorized that the bubbles were caused by friction between cellsthat were exposed to the radiation.
Bioelectromagnetics July 2005; 26(5):398-405IsraCast July 27, 2005
Dr. Mercola's Comment:
Electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from cell phones is a topic that provokes a good deal of controversy. Many experts believe that the radiation is too low-level to cause harm. However, they often base this on an examination of thermal or heat-related effects. The danger from cell phones is far more likely to originate in the low-intensity pulsed microwave radiation that the phones emit.
There is a growing body of evidence that long-term exposure to this kind of cell phone radiation can indeed be a danger. As well as these studies showing they can affect the sensitive cells of your eyes, there has been research indicating that it can cause:
- Brain cancer
- Tumor growth on the auditory nerve
- Possibly Alzheimer's disease
- Many other potential problems
Fortunately, the danger decreases exponentially the farther the cell phone is from your body. If you have a cell phone, I strongly recommend you use a headset, and keep the phone itself well away from your body.
Although that reduces the radiation risk considerably, some emissions can still travel up the headset wire and into the head. Probably the best solution is to get a cell phone with a good speaker phone and always use it. Keeping the phone as far away from your body is the ideal solution.
For many of you this is simply not very practical, so I recommend attaching the newair cell phone headsets that we have just introduced. If you use a cell phone without the speaker phone feature, then this is simply a must. There is no excuse to not use this technology, which virtually eliminates all the dangers of using a cell phone.
There are also, of course, more commonplace dangers to using cell phones. If you use one while driving your car, you increase your chance of having an accident by up to 400 percent. Worldwide, auto accidents account for 23 percentof all deaths from injury, which comes to over1 million deaths each year. At the same time, cancer, another deadly cell phone risk, has surpassed heart disease in America as the leading cause of death for those under 85. Itkills over 1,500 people every day in the United Statesalone.
Every year, more and more people are switching to cell phones. Many are now using cell phones as their only phone, especially among younger people, who could be exposing themselves to EMF radiation and other risks over a period of decades.
Please avoid having yourself become a statistic. If you use a cell phone at all, wear a headset with a ferrite bead, don't use the cell phone in the car, and in general try to minimize your cell phone use.
Related Articles:
Electromagnetic Fields and Cell PhonesAre Cell Phones Safe For Your Children?
"If Mobile Phones Were a Type of Food, They Simply Would Not be Licensed"
Dr. Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com, one of the world's most visited and trusted health websites, and publisher of the free Mercola.com e-newsletter -- the #1 dietary health and wellness newsletter on the Web with over 500,000 subscribers. Dr. Mercola, a physician for over two decades, is also a New York Times bestselling author whose latest book, "Dr. Mercola's Total Health Program," presents his entire renowned dietary health program and has sold over 150,000 copies. He is routinely interviewed by the media for his expert insights, including CNN and ABC World News Tonight. His passion is to change the fatally flawed conventional medical system to one focused on real prevention and cure.
