16 March 2011

Link to Canadian film, URANIUM

http://www.nfb.ca/film/Uranium


The nuclear industry as a serious political issue has gone viral on the internet, in the wake of the Japanese meltdown. Globally, the anti-war/anti-nuke movements have a mature and strong, well-established infrastructure. Together as a coalition, they have the potential to exert a mighty pressure at this time, given public preoccupation with the immediate hazards of airborne radiation products. We’ve already seen the great impact on public consciousness, of the global profiteering in food and other commodities, and the diffuse anger in response – ranging from the middle-eastern rebellions, to the emerging “99% movement” in the USA.

There is a possibility that the Japanese government may be an early victim to the lack of natural disaster and nuclear safety preparedness, and cover up of the current crisis. If that occurs, it’s entirely possible that a right-wing replacement government will fill the political void: a result which might be welcomed by a bumbling Obama administration, given its failed policies of containing China’s rising influence in Asia. With the significant news blackout in mainstream media, many “alternative” commentators now expect the worst-case scenario may quickly affect North America, with considerablepublic anger directed at governments who hide the facts. In Germany, for example, the Merkel government, facing an election in a week or two has quickly suspended allnuclear electric plans pending further investigation.
There has perhaps never been a better opportunity for the consolidated peace/anti-nuclear/green movements worldwide to exert a very significant influence on public policy; re-opening a substantive non-proliferation debate, and even asserting widespread popular opposition to the current status quo. A responsible but firm advocacy of public health and safety responses downwind of the nucleotide stream would go a long way to establish credibility; and a rational linkage to the military geopolitical nexus could produce an unprecedented opportunity for the world to re-think some of our basic ethical precepts about the nuclear genie which has been released.
Canada, as one of the world’s strongest proponents of nuclear “development” will do its utmost to deep-six any real critical discussion of the issue, due to its obvious economic self-interest. As a nation with considerable experience in and promotion of an industry inimical to public health we have a humanitarian obligation to play an active, assertive role in the debate. That means confronting both government and industry, and disseminating factual rebuttals to Orwellian double-speak whenever and wherever it happens, in an effort to expose the contradictions and educate an already wary public. The basic premises are really very simple and understandable. Those who obfuscate the facts through complex scientific data and scenarios, or celebrity status as “experts” must be quickly debunked. The anti-nuclear/anti-war infrastructure has the capacity to do this but it must act immediately if it is to seize the initiative.
This link connects to a powerful 45 minute film worth watching if you haven’t seen it before. It was produced by a former associate of mine at the National Film Board and documents the Canadian uranium industry in the Elliot Lake region of Ontario. I lived and worked there in 1956-59, in the isolated town site of “Pronto Uranium Mine”, the very first developed by Rio Tinto on the shores of Lake Lauzon in Algoma Mills, Ontario before Elliot Lake was even built. I’ve seen the environmental abuses first hand and early on, and was aware of the premature deaths of almost all our neighbours, before the mine was cleverly “disappeared” from most historical records. On Google Earth you can still see the vestiges of “yellowcake” and other by-products in the tailings ponds and lakes, long after the mines were de-commissioned. The film tells the rest of the story, and there are many articulate Canadian scientists in the vanguard of the opposition movement today.

I urge you to watch the film and talk to your colleagues about “upping the ante” on government and industry in the wake of the unfolding human catastrophe in Japan. It is not the first such catastrophe. It may very well affect us and our grand-children directlyand, unless we are able to do something about it, it will certainly not be the last. With apologies for my truncated editorialization and best regards,
Jay Spark

Link to video: Lessons from Chernobyl

List of Power Reactor Units


List of Power Reactor Units

For more information, see Map of Power Reactor Sites and our annually published Information Digest, Appendix A.
Plant Name
Docket Number
Reactor
Type
LocationOwner/OperatorNRC Region
Arkansas Nuclear 1
05000313
PWR6 miles WNW of Russellville,  AREntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.4
Arkansas Nuclear 2
05000368
PWR6 miles WNW of Russellville,  AREntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.4
Beaver Valley 1
05000334
PWR17 miles W of McCandless,  PAFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.1
Beaver Valley 2
05000412
PWR17 miles W of McCandless,  PAFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.1
Braidwood 1
05000456
PWR20 miles SSW of Joilet,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Braidwood 2
05000457
PWR20 miles SSW of Joilet,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Browns Ferry 1
05000259
BWR32 miles W of Huntsville, ALTennessee Valley Authority2
Browns Ferry 2
05000260
BWR32 miles W of Huntsville, ALTennessee Valley Authority2
Browns Ferry 3
05000296
BWR32 miles W of Huntsville, ALTennessee Valley Authority2
Brunswick 1
05000325
BWR40 miles S of Wilmington, NCProgress Energy2
Brunswick 2
05000324
BWR40 miles S of Wilmington, NCProgress Energy2
Byron 1
05000454
PWR17 miles SW of Rockford,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Byron 2
05000455
PWR17 miles SW of Rockford,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Callaway
05000483
PWR25 miles ENE of Jefferson City, MOAmeren UE4
Calvert Cliffs 1
05000317
PWR40 miles S of Annapolis,  MDConstellation Energy1
Calvert Cliffs 2
05000318
PWR40 miles S of Annapolis,  MDConstellation Energy1
Catawba 1
05000413
PWR18 miles S of Charlotte, NCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Catawba 2
05000414
PWR18 miles S of Charlotte, NCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Clinton
05000461
BWR23 miles SSE of Bloomington, ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Columbia Generating Station
05000397
BWR20 miles NNE of Pasco, WAEnergy Northwest4
Comanche Peak 1
05000445
PWR40 miles SW of Fort Worth, TXTXU Generating Company LP4
Comanche Peak 2
05000446
PWR40 miles SW of Fort Worth, TXTXU Generating Company LP4
Cooper
05000298
BWR23 miles S of Nebraska City,  NENebraska Public Power District4
Crystal River 3
05000302
PWR80 miles N of Tampa, FLProgress Energy2
D.C. Cook 1
05000315
PWR13 miles S of Benton Harbor,  MIIndiana/Michigan Power Co.3
D.C. Cook 2 
05000316
PWR13 miles S of Benton Harbor,  MIIndiana/Michigan Power Co.3
Davis-Besse
05000346
PWR21 miles ESE of Toledo,  OHFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.3
Diablo Canyon 1
05000275
PWR12 miles WSW of San Luis Obispo,  CAPacific Gas & Electric Co.4
Diablo Canyon 2
05000323
PWR12 miles WSW of San Luis Obispo,  CAPacific Gas & Electric Co.4
Dresden 2
05000237
BWR25 miles SW of Joliet, ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Dresden 3
05000249
BWR25 miles SW of Joliet, ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Duane Arnold
05000331
BWR8 miles NW of Cedar Rapids,  IAFlorida Power & Light Co.3
Farley 1
05000348
PWR18 miles SE of Dothan,  ALSouthern Nuclear Operating Co.2
Farley 2
05000364
PWR18 miles SE of Dothan,  ALSouthern Nuclear Operating Co.2
Fermi 2
05000341
BWR25 miles NE of Toledo,  OHDetroit Edison Co.3
FitzPatrick
05000333
BWR6 miles NE of Oswego,  NYEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.1
Fort Calhoun
05000285
PWR19 miles N of Omaha,  NEOmaha Public Power District4
Ginna
05000244
PWR20 miles NE of Rochester,  NYConstellation Energy1
Grand Gulf 1
05000416
BWR20 miles S of Vicksburg,  MSEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.4
Hatch 1
05000321
BWR20 miles S of Vidalia, GASouthern Nuclear Operating Co., Inc.2
Hatch 2
05000366
BWR20 miles S of Vidalia, GASouthern Nuclear Operating Co., Inc.2
Hope Creek 1
05000354
BWR18 miles SE of Wilmington,  DEPSE&G Nuclear1
Indian Point 2
05000247
PWR24 miles N of New York City,  NYEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.1
Indian Point 3
05000286
PWR24 miles N of New York City,  NYEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.1
Kewaunee
05000305
PWR27 miles ESE of Green Bay,  WIDominion Generation3
La Salle 1
05000373
BWR11 miles SE of Ottawa,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
La Salle 2
05000374
BWR11 miles SE of Ottawa,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Limerick 1
05000352
BWR21 miles NW of Philadelphia,  PAExelon Generation Co., LLC1
Limerick 2
05000353
BWR21 miles NW of Philadelphia,  PAExelon Generation Co., LLC1
McGuire 1
05000369
PWR17 miles N of Charlotte,  NCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
McGuire 2
05000370
PWR17 miles N of Charlotte,  NCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Millstone 2
05000336
PWR3.2 miles WSW of New London,  CTDominion Generation1
Millstone 3
05000423
PWR3.2 miles WSW of New London,  CTDominion Generation1
Monticello
05000263
BWR35 miles NW of Minneapolis,  MNNuclear Management Co.3
Nine Mile Point 1
05000220
BWR6 miles NE of Oswego,  NYConstellation Energy1
Nine Mile Point 2
05000410
BWR6 miles NE of Oswego,  NYConstellation Energy1
North Anna 1
05000338
PWR40 miles NW of Richmond,  VADominion Generation2
North Anna 2
05000339
PWR40 miles NW of Richmond,  VADominion Generation2
Oconee 1
05000269
PWR30 miles W of Greenville,  SCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Oconee 2
05000270
PWR30 miles W of Greenville,  SCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Oconee 3
05000287
PWR30 miles W of Greenville,  SCDuke Energy Power Company, LLC2
Oyster Creek
05000219
BWR9 miles S of Toms River,  NJExelon Generation Co., LLC1
Palisades
05000255
PWR5 miles S of South Haven,  MIEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.3
Palo Verde 1
05000528
PWR50 miles W of Phoenix,  AZArizona Public Service Co.4
Palo Verde 2
05000529
PWR50 miles W of Phoenix,  AZArizona Public Service Co.4
Palo Verde 3
05000530
PWR50 miles W of Phoenix,  AZArizona Public Service Co.4
Peach Bottom 2
05000277
BWR17.9 miles S of Lancaster,  PAExelon Generation Co., LLC1
Peach Bottom 3
05000278
BWR17.9 miles S of Lancaster,  PAExelon Generation Co., LLC1
Perry 1
05000440
BWR35 miles NE of Cleveland, OHFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.3
Pilgrim 1
05000293
BWR38 miles SE of Boston, MAEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.1
Point Beach 1
05000266
PWR13 miles NNW of Manitowoc,  WIFPL Energy Point Beach, LLC3
Point Beach 2
05000301
PWR13 miles NNW of Manitowoc,  WIFPL Energy Point Beach, LLC3
Prairie Island 1
05000282
PWR28 miles SE of Minneapolis,  MNNuclear Management Co.3
Prairie Island 2
05000306
PWR28 miles SE of Minneapolis,  MNNuclear Management Co.3
Quad Cities 1
05000254
BWR20 miles NE of Moline,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
Quad Cities 2
05000265
BWR20 miles NE of Moline,  ILExelon Generation Co., LLC3
River Bend 1
05000458
BWR24 miles NNW of Baton Rouge,  LAEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.4
Robinson 2
05000261
PWR26 miles NW of Florence,  SCProgress Energy2
Saint Lucie 1
05000335
PWR10 miles SE of Ft. Pierce,  FLFlorida Power & Light Co.2
Saint Lucie 2
05000389
PWR10 miles SE of Ft. Pierce,  FLFlorida Power & Light Co.2
Salem 1
05000272
PWR18 miles S of Wilmington,  DEPSE&G Nuclear1
Salem 2
05000311
PWR18 miles S of Wilmington,  DEPSE&G Nuclear1
San Onofre 2
05000361
PWR45 miles SE of Long Beach, CASouthern California Edison Co.4
San Onofre 3
05000362
PWR45 miles SE of Long Beach, CASouthern California Edison Co.4
Seabrook 1
05000443
PWR13 miles S of Portsmouth,  NHFlorida Power & Light Co.1
Sequoyah 1
05000327
PWR16 miles NE of Chattanooga,  TNTennessee Valley Authority2
Sequoyah 2
05000328
PWR16 miles NE of Chattanooga,  TNTennessee Valley Authority2
Shearon Harris 1
05000400
PWR20 miles SW of Raleigh,  NCProgress Energy2
South Texas 1
05000498
PWR90 miles SW of Houston, TXSTP Nuclear Operating Co.4
South Texas 2
05000499
PWR90 miles SW of Houston, TXSTP Nuclear Operating Co.4
Summer
05000395
PWR26 miles NW of Columbia,  SCSouth Carolina Electric & Gas Co.2
Surry 1
05000280
PWR17 miles NW of Newport News,  VADominion Generation2
Surry 2
05000281
PWR17 miles NW of Newport News,  VADominion Generation2
Susquehanna 1
05000387
BWR70 miles NE of Harrisburg, PAPPL Susquehanna, LLC1
Susquehanna 2
05000388
BWR70 miles NE of Harrisburg, PAPPL Susquehanna, LLC1
Three Mile Island 1
05000289
PWR10 miles SE of Harrisburg,  PAExelon Generation Co., LLC1
Turkey Point 3
05000250
PWR20 miles S of Miami,  FLFlorida Power & Light Co.2
Turkey Point 4
05000251
PWR20 miles S of Miami,  FLFlorida Power & Light Co.2
Vermont Yankee
05000271
BWR5 miles S of Brattleboro,  VTEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.1
Vogtle 1
05000424
PWR26 miles SE of Augusta,  GASouthern Nuclear Operating Co.2
Vogtle 2
05000425
PWR26 miles SE of Augusta,  GASouthern Nuclear Operating Co.2
Waterford 3
05000382
PWR25 miles W of New Orleans,  LAEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.4
Watts Bar 1
05000390
PWR60 miles SW of Knoxville, TNTennessee Valley Authority2
Wolf Creek 1
05000482
PWR3.5 miles NE of Burlington,  KSWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.4
To top of page

15 March 2011

radiation level, jet stream and the US, Potassium, danger and effect of meltdown: Bruce Beach


  1. Stay Cool (Bruce Beach)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "Bruce Beach" <language@webpal.org>
To: <arktwo@mail.pairowoodies.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:19:05 -0400
Subject: [Arktwo] Stay Cool

I will address in this email 4 subjects.

1. The radiation levels in Japan
2. Jet Streams and radiation danger in the US.
3. Potassium Iodide and radiation protection
4. The Danger and effect of Meltdown

---------
1. The radiation levels in Japan

I have a direct watch on the situation in Japan.
Minute to minute reporting on the scene as it happens.

There has been a substantial increase
in the radiation
on some of the disaster sites.

Substantial for the location
but still insignificant
as far as the US is concerned.

Before -
reported levels were in the microsievert level
and now -
they are being reported in the millisievert level.
Millisievert levels are a thousand times higher
than microsievert levels.

Still
10 millisieverts = 1R (only)

Uh-oh.
I have just now lost my feed.
This is the first time today -
that this has happened.

The news was so important -
that the Prime Minister himself
came on to make the announcement -
and now it has been interrupted.

I don't know the significance of this.
Perhaps it will resume
before I finish typing.

Anyway - at one Japanese nuclear location
at one particular spot
readings of 10R (I did the conversion)
were reported.

This would be VERY serious
if you were experiencing that -
but you are here -
and that is there.

In point of fact -
the area surrounding that site
has been evacuated for 20 kilometers -
and for the area from 20 kilometers to 30 kilometers away
the people are being told to stay indoors.

Now further - regarding the significance of 10R.
A healthy adult male
could stay in the presence of that source
for 20 hours -
without experiencing noticeable effect.

Ahhh - my feed is back.

But again -
that is there -
and not here.

In fact if you were there -
you would have to be RIGHT there.

Most likely (almost certainly) if you were a distance
of a quarter mile from the location
that is 10R -
the radiation would then be less than 1R.

The effect of radiation reduces with distance.
Think of it as a light bulb.
If you are right next to a light bulb
you can read by it.
But if it is dark and you move a distance away from it
you soon don't get enough light to read.

If you are right next to a radiation source -
you can be 'burned' by it -
but the further away from it that you move -
the less 'burn' you will get from it.

This is all by analogy.
We don't usually use these exact words
in explaining radiation exposure.

--------
I am still irritated by the nebulous reporting
of the media.

Such as the radiation has doubled!
So what - if it was insignificantly low?

The New York Times
reported that sailors on a ship
that went nearby -
got as much radiation in two days -
as they would normally get in a month.

This means NOTHING!

The background cosmic radiation
that we all get in a month
is insignificant -
and the fact they got that much in two days -
means NOTHING!

In fact -
there are places in the US
where the radiation is more than ten times
NATURALLY higher -
than the sailors experienced.

Yet New York Times went on and on
about the decontamination procedures
that the sailors went through -
and so did the rest of the media.

It makes it out like it is something -
but it is NOTHING!

Likewise - pictures are shown of technicians
in frightening radiation suits
testing small children with radiation probes.

What nonsense!
The technicians don't need any protection -
even if the radiation level in the child's thyroid
(where they measure on the side of the neck)
has been raised by the Iodine 131 isotope.

Scare! Scare! Scare!
Drama! Drama! Drama!

Nothing! Nothing! Nothing!
Wait until you have a nuclear war -
and then you will have SOMETHING!
Try getting KI then.
Hah!

--------------
2. Jet Streams and radiation danger in the US.

Boy, or boy, or boy.
So much I hear about that.
Beautiful graphics.
Interactive sites.
Video and satellite updates.
Just a flood information.

Overwhelming and all irrelevant.
It just isn't going up into the air like that.
This is not a nuclear explosion.

Even the hydrogen explosions
(and that has nothing to do
with the likes of a hydrogen bomb)
are not taking the stuff up that high.

It is all little and local.
Even for the Japanese -
thirty miles out.
Certainly not coming across the Pacific.

Even the amounts that they are dealing with there -
are still peace time standards -
and all the thing we have been talking about
for years -
are wartime standards -
which is a thousand -
multi-thousand -
more radiation.

But -
the hysteria continues.
It is worse than
"The Martians are coming -
the Martians are coming."
or
"The Boogie Man is about to get you."

Suck it up folks.
This is not a threat.

----------
3. Potassium Iodide (KI) and radiation protection

Okay - maybe some good will come out of  this -
and people will stock up on KI.

But you aren't going to need it now -
for this.

And there is a great amount of misunderstanding
about what KI does for you.

It simply protects you from one isotope.
Iodine 131.

That gets into particles in water and milk -
and if you consume it -
it can get into your thyroid.

After (during) a nuclear event -
THAT YOU ARE EXPOSED TO -
(not here - for what is going on
in some parts of Japan)
you need to take one dose of KI per day -
during when it is going on
and for thirty days after it ends -
and after that -
the radiation in the fallout is non-effective
because of the half-life of Iodine-131.

How KI works
is that it saturates your thyroid -
which will therefore not take up anymore iodine -
of any isotope -
and so anymore iodine in your system
is just expelled in the urine.

BUT -
there are lots of other kinds of radiation out there -
and in a nuclear war -
(or other catastrophic event)
there are only three defenses.

a. Shielding
(get in a shelter that will stop it).
If it is serious -
indoors and duct tape is not going to do it.

b. Distance
(move away from it)
In Japan they are recommending 30 miles.
In reality a mile is fine -
so long as it is in the right direction -
which means upwind -
rather than downwind -
but who knows which way the wind is going to blow.

And then if you are getting it from fallout -
the wind can blow it to you
most anywhere.

But - in this case -
not clear across the Pacific.
There is too little -
and it is too far.

c. Time
Radiation decays over time.
Some over a long time -
but most very quickly.

It takes time for radiation to be blown
from Japan to the US.
During that time -
it will become practically nothing.

---------
4. The Danger and effect of Meltdown

Yep - they have a problem.
There.
Not here.

China Syndrome -
Chernobyl -
Plutonium Disaster -

I have heard it all.

Number one - the generators are not going to blow up
like a nuclear weapon.

Number two -
while yes - the Japanese have a very serious problem -
it isn't coming here -
in great quantity -
no matter how badly it melts down.

Number three -
as I explained in the previous newsletter
the amount of Plutonium that this event will increase
the 'Plutonium burden' we all - already carry
is not that great.

Everyone breathing on this planet -
has absorbed some minute amounts of Plutonium already -
from the in atmospheric testing
that the US has done.

More and more of the stuff is being generated
all the time -
especially by the nuclear power plants -
and yes, that is a very immoral issue -
regarding the waste -
that we are imposing on future generations -
but the Japan thing -
is not changing the equation for you.

------------
So -
bottom line -
stay cool.

There are serious problems elsewhere -
that are going to affect you
much more than the Japan nuclear disasters.

The Tsunami itself created Japan's biggest problem.
On top of that -
the loss of nuclear power
has created a SERIOUS energy problem for them -
which they will try to rectify by buying oil -
and THAT is going to affect YOU.

The whole scene has diverted people's attention
from SERIOUS things that are happening -
in the world of
economics
international relations
monetary markets.

At the moment my minute to minute news in Japan
is showing their stock market off 12%.
That will also probably have an effect on Europe -
before the Markets open in the US tomorrow.

A great amount of military activity is going on -
as the US
the United Arab Emirates
and Saudi Arabia
get ready to intervene in Bahrain -
which certainly affects Iran -
and most people are not even aware of it.

Heads up!
Look at Oil---> Economy
Middle East---> Revolutions

More Bigger Better(???) earthquakes are coming.

Hold on to you hats.
This ride has just begun.

Don't sweat the small stuff.
Meltdowns, Jet Streams, KI, -
Hah!

You aint seen nothin yet.

But -
stay cool.
Get collected.
Enjoy the trip.
Armageddon - Earth Changes -
New World Cycles -
are something that do not happen -
even every millennium.

You are very privileged to get to see one.

Perhaps you feel like the guest of honor -
at the old western necktie party who said -
"If it weren't for the honor of it -
I would rather be somewhere else."

But -
you are on this planet -
and there is no getting off it - (for you)
alive.

Stay cool.
There are hotter places to go.


Peace and love,
Bruce
DawnSayer@webpal.org


Realism on how afraid should we be - Bruce Beach nuclear expert

 1. Now The Numbers (Bruce Beach)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "Bruce Beach" <language@webpal.org>
To: <arktwo@mail.pairowoodies.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:04:53 -0400
Subject: [Arktwo] Now The Numbers

The numbers -
if you are seeing them at all
probably look strange
and not something you are used to seeing.

Lots of generalities -
that mean nothing.

"The amount of radiation has doubled."
"The level is a thousand times higher than usual."
Etc.

Without actual numbers -
all that means nothing.

The numbers that we see
look unusual -
because like with metric -
the rest of the world went one way -
and the US another.

Canada and much of the world
uses units from the Système International (SI)
to measure radiation.
The SI is based on the metric system.
These units include the:

   * becquerel
   * gray
   * sievert
   * coulomb/kg

From the early 1900s,
through to the 30s,
until the 1960s,
another set of units were used.
They were called the:

   * curie
   * rad
   * rem
   * Roentgen

The United States still uses these units.
In point of fact -
I do also -
but sometimes in reading scientific articles
I have to go in and make the conversions.

The reason that I still use them
is that the radiation detection equipment
(which is surplus from the sixties) -
that we all have -
is marked in those units.

And - once again -
the US still uses those units -
and so do many of the militaries in the world.

The distinctions between

Rad
Rem
Roentgen

are insignificant as far as laymen are concerned -
and we speak simply in terms of R.

The distinction between a
mR and an R, however,
is NOT insignificant -
because a milli (the m)
is one thousand times smaller.

And a milli is a thousand micros -
so -
a micro (µ) is a MILLION times smaller amount
than an R.

Here is a conversion calculator for the measurements

http://www.unit-conversion.info/metric.html

and here is a chart
that explains the differences
between the units (methods) of measure.

http://tinyurl.com/69mweaf

----------
Okay -
so here is as accurate a figure
as I have found:

Fukushima plant radiation at 882 micro sievert vs ! 500 ! allowable in 1
hour

Now -
what does that tell us?

The key numbers that we want to understand are:

1 sievert (Sv), = 100 rem
10 microsievert (µSv) = 1 millirem (mrem)

Therefore dividing by ten:
88.2 = 88.2 millirem

Let us be ultraconservative and say -
that what we have there is 100 millirem
and not just 88.2

If it were 100
then it would take TEN TIMES that amount
to get up to one REM.

When we consider that it takes
an accumulation of 200 REM
to affect a healthy adult male -
then it would take ten times 200
or 2000 times that amount to affect
a healthy adult male.

What we are saying is -
the adult male would have to stay
on that radiation site
in the presence of that radiation
for two thousand hours -
or about one hundred days -
to feel the effects.

Even then that would not happen.
The reason is -
the radiation at the site
would be decaying (unless more is released)
AND
the accumulation in the individual would be decaying.

Radiation exposure is much like sunburn.
You can get a bit each day -
and it is like getting a tan.

You can get a whole lot over time -
and it won't necessarily hurt you.
My friend Ron -
who died in his eighties -
(from unrelated causes)
being in the industry
got a lifetime exposure of over 6,000R.

600R is fatal in a very short time -
if gotten all at once
(that is to say in a very short time).

So what goes with the statement above -
that only 500 microsieverts are allowable in one hour?

Well - the standards are just set -
VERY, VERY conservatively for peace time -
(non-catastrophic) events.

I do hope that you get the picture -
that nothing is about to come over here -
from the Japan nuclear problem -
and get you in your sleep.
There is just not that much there -
that is coming over here.
At least - anytime soon.

To make a long story short -
when the measurement says micro -
"Don't worry about it".

-----------
Don't panic -
you are not on the Titanic.

Well -
not exactly true -
because the whole world is a Titanic -
but I am not sure that the Japan Tsunami -
and the nuclear power plants were the iceberg.

There are other concerns and considerations.
People have written to me
asking me what about this Plutonium thing?

They have pointed out that nuke weapons
are generally made from Uranium -
and that these plants ran on Plutonium.

Among the scare literature
I have read statements such as:
"Plutonium is the deadliest substance
known to man."

Well - not exactly.
Lots of scare literature out there.
Concern is that when it becomes powdered
and people breath minute particles of it
that it can get in the lungs
and into the bone structures
and cause cancer.

Much the same story
that you hear about DU (Depleted Uranium) -
and there really is not much that I can say
to people who are already thoroughly convinced about
Depleted Uranium
Water Flouridation
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Asbestos
Chemtrails
or hundreds of other things
that worry people about our modern technological society.

But yes, the Japan nuclear generating stations
use Plutonium.
There are a number of different isotopes
of Plutonium.

Pu-238
Pu-239
Pu-240
Pu-241
Pu-242

I could go on at length
about their half-lives
and other distinctions.

Unfortunately -
we are getting bunches of this stuff
stored around the world -
and it is not going away soon.
Some of it -
once we create it will be around
for thousands of years.

We now all have minute particles of it
in our bodies -
from the nuclear testing and power plants.

Plutonium is more dangerous when inhaled than when ingested. The risk of
lung cancer increases once the total dose equivalent of inhaled radiation
exceeds 400 mSv.

(That is dose -
not the level of exposure -
or what is in the air.
So many things -
that those who haven't studied the subject -
that is to say - have had formal training -
fail to make the distinction.)

The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that the lifetime cancer risk for
inhaling 5,000 plutonium particles, each about 3 microns wide, to be 1% over
the background U.S. average.

Ingestion or inhalation of large amounts may cause acute radiation poisoning
and death; NO HUMAN IS KNOWN TO HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF INHALING OR INGESTING
PLUTONIUM, and many people have measurable amounts of plutonium in their
bodies.

As much as 1000 tonnes of plutonium may be in storage with more than 200
tonnes of that either inside or extracted from nuclear weapons.

The rest comes from nuclear power plants.

Immoral, immoral, immoral -
as I keep telling people.
We are supposed to pass a better world
onto our children -
not a worse one.

The plutonium scene
over in Japan
is pretty bad right now -
or could become so -
but it is not coming here.

Even there -
it will only affect those right nearby -
if there is a meltdown.

Nothing like Nagasaki!
Because - it isn't a nuclear weapon.
Weapons are different -
and put the radiation up into the air
which then comes as fallout.

I mention Nagasaki -
because the US dropped two bombs on Japan -
to experiment with them.

The second one was particularly an experiment
because Japan was in the process of surrendering.

The nature of the experiment was
that the first bomb on Hiroshima
was an uranium bomb
and the second bomb on Nagasaki
was a plutonium bomb.

So here we are back again -
to a big plutonium experiment.
The question is -
was nuclear power generated by it -
worth the hassle to the Japanese.

Mind you -
most of the destruction that we are witnessing -
was caused by the Tsunami -
and had nothing really to do with the nuclear power plants.

I do hope that people can really make the distinction
and see that this wasn't a nuclear weapon -
and that the fallout from it
really isn't like what we can look forward to
with a nuclear war.

Still, it is not a bad thing -
if you are prompted to go out and get KI.
I talk with Shane daily -
and he is getting multiple orders per minute -
and has long sold out of the Potassium Iodide pills.

He has asked me to
pass along his apologies
that he can't answer the emails
that he is getting from friends
because he is hundreds of personal emails behind.

He does still have vials
of KI concentrate for $20
which will make up 200 adult doses
or at least 400 child doses
and which you can still order from his web site.

My advice is to get that now -
because while I don't think you are going to need it -
for this event -
you will for the future event
that I have been warning you about.
THAT is going to be altogether different.

You can find Shane's source at the

www.ki4u.com

web site.

Now, because I anticipate that this newsletter
may get circulated around -
I will tell you a bit about myself.

a. I am an OLD guy - (nearing 80)

b. I am a Radiological Scientific Officer

c. I have kept up with field -
       studying and writing on the subject
       for the last many decades.

d. I have a large survival facility called the Ark Two

e. And a web page at:

       www.webpal.org

where you can enroll for my newsletter.

Peace and love,
Bruce
DawnSayer@webpal.org